Signup
LoginRecent Posts by oldbreadstinks
-
-
Originally posted by Dr Who:
Some issues like the one below should be settled by arbitration rather than in court....
http://www.straitstimes.com/Breaking...ry_310229.html
court, charge them and then sentance them to work in a mosque.
-
-
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
How many times do people have to repeat something before it gets into your head? If people follow my advice, the foreigners working in Singapore at the present has to go home.
if people follow your advice, foreigners won't be the only ones going home.
anyway if you haven't noticed you're doing what LKY mentioned, repeating a lie enough to turn it into the truth.
-
-
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
The site that the above post links to is prone to run out of bandwidth because of ass-licking dogs spamming the site... so if you cannot link to it, either link to the google cache or wait for the beginning of the next month to link.
or you've posted it around enough times to kill off the bandwidth. how many places did you post it in anyway? at the rate you post here you've probably gathered enough traffic to kill it off
-
-
-
his letter always have words like "everyone" & "everybody" "knows" but in actual fact if this kind of thing is "everyone and everybody knows" people would start rioting liao. its like arguing over whether "legal corruption" is corruption.
Therefore there was no insult at all. My claim is factually correct. I am lawyer and I choose my words with discretion. But whatever the truth was, did not matter to Lee Kuan Yew's agent, Judge Kan Ting Chiu that day. He finds that I insulted the judge when there was no insult at all. And now, the state controlled Straits Times picks it up and repeats that defamation again and again hoping that people will believe that I had in fact insulted the judge.even if he's factually correct he still insulted the judge and he can't even prove himself factually correct unless someone directly involved in the "prostituting" comes up to admit it in court or at least have some undeniable evidence for the "prostituting"
-
-
-
Originally posted by Fatum:
cos there's no gluttony this time ? ..
haiz harsh reality, i tried asking my friends
can't get much other then laughter and rude replies. a few even
asked if i'm going because i want to check for STDs.btw can i have your number again? my phone just concuss again.
Edited by oldbreadstinks 05 Dec `08, 1:05AM
-
-
-
Originally posted by jojobeach:
You need to listen to Sinead O conner's .. Nothing Compares To You
With the way you are exposing her identity and letting other guys know you've already made out with her..
I say, she's better off without such a kiss and tell jerk (you, yes you)
It was a mistake on her part to even gave you a chance...time you take a hike dude.
i don't usually agree with her but i think she's
totally right this time
-
-
-
Originally posted by skythewood:
yay, let’s all repeat exactly the same post over and over again!
Are electricity tariffs too high?
The answer is no!
According to Temasek Review 2008, its Net Current Assets is S$2114m. It is a sharp plunge from the past few years, thus explaining the need to sell off the three gencos.
Currently, two gencos has already been sold to suckers! The remaining one, PowerSeraya, is in the process of being sold to suckers!
If the earnings of PowerSeraya are S$300m and the selling price for its peers is a PE of 10, the maximum price that PowerSeraya could command is S$3b.
Thus in a perfect world scenario, if the electricity tariffs were to fall by one- third, the selling price will also fall to S$2b.
Thus, in order to help Temasek Holdings to get a good price for PowerSeraya, even the EXTRAORDINARY government would have to do something that is dishonest and betrays its conscience!
If the EXTRAORDINARY government didn’t do something that is dishonest and betrays its conscience, the GST will have to go up as the EXTRAORDINARY government depends on the Net Investment Income (NII) to balance its budget!
The amount of NII depends partly on the performance of Temasek Holdings.
MM Lee is right when he said that if you put the wrong team in charge, Singaporeans would suffer!
A wrong team was put in charge of Temasek Holdings, which explains why Singaporeans have to suffer!
After knowing the true reasons, do Singaporeans now felt that the electricity tariffs are too high?
Do Singaporeans really want the electricity tariffs to come down?
If they do, they should render assistance to the incompetent management of Temasek Holdings and help to find some suckers to buy PowerSeraya!
After all the 3 gencos have been sold, the regulator will do its job!
-
-
-
Originally posted by DigitalArt90:
Well, I never really bothered about all her ramblings, but hell from what I hear, that's the impression I get.
She say they all not happy with the guy, I think that's wrong, that he thinks he's a big hero, blah blah blah. But his family end up suffering, I think that's wrong plain and simple. There, more logical now???? if it seemed to not make sense the previous time then fine
dunno about your aunt but it was reported the boy's family were worried before he even tried that. and they just hope to put the whole thing behind.
-
-
-
i'm a singaporean chinese guy, and i do feel that they're more manly to a certain extend. but it depends on what you're comparing to.
like for me if i go anywhere i like to move around or do exploring but when i travel with my male friends so far quite a few of the outings ended up like shit. everything i suggested i'm told its too dangerous or they're scared, can't swim(when water only up til knees), got insects.
once i had to go through a trail through a hill alone because the rest think insects would bit or would get lost(despite being told there's a concrete trail)
when i talk to foreigners(not just white) they have all those experiences i don't have makes ones feel less adventurous compared to them.
Edited by oldbreadstinks 01 Dec `08, 3:13AM
-
-
-
Originally posted by Ageleon:
erm...dun get it?wats the link?
strength of belief,
the mere existence of an unbeliever who dare to even speak in defence of their faith's enemy is offensive enough.
they tell you LKY is a bad man and believe strongly they must be pure and reject him and his things totally then you pop in to say you're neutral but still appreciate what he did. in their eyes your action not neutral liao. you're one law away from being burnt on the stake
Edited by oldbreadstinks 01 Dec `08, 12:41AM
-
i thought you refering to people who need
a salary ceiling
